A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the representative director of E (hereinafter referred to as E) who has constructed the D apartment in Busan-gun, Busan-gun.

On February 11, 1999, the Defendant received and kept a letter from F, the president of the representative of occupants of D apartment houses, to transfer all the apartment sales contract rights to the occupants' representative circuits in E (hereinafter referred to as the "original letter"), and decided to forge a letter stating that 14 households unsold in lots are entitled to the sales contract for the purpose of directly selling 14 households unsold in lots E.

1. On January 10, 201, the Defendant forged private documents, stating that “The transfer of ownership is purely transferred by a purely selling-out contract owner at his own discretion, and the persons related to the obligations of the contractor with the contractor and the persons related to the obligations of the contractor with the contractor, the persons related to the settlement of construction payments, etc. shall be dealt with by the business owner’s consent or the business owner’s decision,” among the original documents, using a computer kept at H office located in Daegu-gu G.

The remainder except paragraph (5) shall be prepared with the same content, and Paragraph (3) shall state that "3. purely transferred ownership transfer shall be 14 households remaining after the tenant representative's arbitrarily transferred to the tenant representative's association shall be treated from E by the executive company, the persons related to the debt of the corporation and the persons related to the settlement balance of construction funds, etc.", and Paragraph (5) of this Article deleted the part that "the sale statement of the certificate No. 417 of 199 shall follow the sale statement".

On the other hand, the Defendant continued to attach well the F seal of each original document to the name of F in a new letter prepared by I, and then copied it.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a letter in the name of F, a private document on rights and obligations.

2. On March 201, the Defendant’s uttering of the above investigation document: (a) a letter in the name of F, each of the buyers of D apartment Na-dong, 103, who was unaware of the forgery, at KDak-gu, Daegu Suwon-gu, J around 201, who was not aware of the forgery.