logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.01.18 2016고단2282
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On September 17, 2010, the Defendant was issued a summary order of a fine of two million won or more for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Gwangju District Court’s net support on September 17, 201, and issued a summary order of a fine of three million won or more for the same crime in the same court on July 27, 2011.

[2] On August 20, 2016, the Defendant driven B Ethmp car under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.074% at a section of about 10km in front of the mountain area of the same Si/Gu, Mayang-si, Mayang-si, Mayang-si, Mayang-si, Mayangyang-si, Magyang-si, Magyang-si, Magyang-si, Magyang-si, Magyang-si, Magyang-do.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Fact-finding reports on drivers of drinking alcohol and inquiry into the results of crackdown on drinking alcohol;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (a summary order, etc.);

1. Relevant legal provisions and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of punishment for a crime, and the selection of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The fact that there is a record of being punished several times for the same kind of crime by driving a vehicle with the same reason for sentencing as the provision of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for protection observation and attendance order, etc., shall be determined as the same as the order, in consideration of the unfavorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant recognizes the crime and reflects against the defendant, favorable circumstances such as the fact that the defendant is at

arrow