Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

At around 1:00 on July 19, 2012, the Defendant: (a) knew that G, which was divorced at the F coffee shop, gave up his right to rear and negotiate about his father H (8 years old); (b) provided the victim I with the awareness that he was found to come to an elementary school going to his father, along with the victim I, who was living together; (c) provided the victim I with the bath theory, such as glare, spawd, spawd, spathd, etc.; and (d) caused the victim’s injury, such as fladddum, flad, etc., requiring treatment for about 14 days, due to fladthing and spathing flad, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A witness I and each legal statement of the J;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect with regard to I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the medical certificate of injury to I;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The Defendant’s summary of the argument reported 112 reports to I et al. on the charge of attempted abduction with respect to I et al., and met I and G. The Defendant’s act constitutes legitimate self-defense or legitimate act, since I first took the Defendant’s scam and attempted to keep the instant scam back again after having turned out of the instant scam, and the Defendant’s act was passively defensively defensive to restrain the Defendant.

2. According to the evidence of the prosecutor’s submission of the judgment, the following facts are acknowledged: (a) before I opened scam to the Defendant, the Defendant and I had already been involved in a scam with each other; and (b) during the process of the Defendant’s leaving scam out of the coffee shop, I returned to the Defendant who carried out scam and carried scam, and he inflicted an injury on I by scam; (c) the Defendant suffered an injury on the Defendant by scaming scam, etc.; (d) the shape of the fighting as above, the degree and part of the injury caused by the fighting, and other matters, such as the Defendant and I, etc.