A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a B-learning car.

On January 10, 2015, the Defendant came to proceed from the astronomical side of Pyeongtaek-si toward Osan, the intersection of the private distance of New-si located in Pyeongtaek-dong, Pyeongtaek-si on January 22:45.

However, since there has been a signal, there has been a duty of care to safely drive a motor vehicle, such as thorough operation of the motor vehicle on the front side and reducing speed in preparation for the stop signal.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded with the lower part of the victim C(the age of 49) driving, which was in the atmosphere of the signal signal at the intersection by negligence, as it was, the lower part of the said passenger car, as the front part of the passenger car.

As a result, the Defendant, by the above occupational negligence, suffered from the fluoral finites in need of treatment for approximately two weeks, and at the same time, escaped without taking necessary measures, such as destroying the said fluoral car to the 2,93,870 won at its repair cost, and providing relief to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Fact-finding report and report on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. On-site photographs and photographs of damaged vehicles;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a written diagnosis and estimate;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes related to the crime, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act [the scope of recommendation] of the order to attend a lecture and the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act [the scope of recommendation] the mitigated area (6 months to 10 months), the mitigated area (the special mitigation person] [the decision of sentence] self-denunciation (the defendant recognized the facts charged in this case]