logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.07.03 2014누71155
과징금부과처분 취소청구
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the same reasoning as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the following matters to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the

(1) Each "31." of the parallel 3 and parallel 4 shall be changed to "23.."

(2) On the 6th anniversary of Article 10 of the Act on Special Measures for the Registration of Real Estate (Article 2(1)1 of the Act on Special Measures for the Registration of Real Estate, which is a premise for the application of Article 10(1) of the former or Real Estate Real Name Act), the following shall be added “If the parties to a contract bear a quid pro quo obligation, the date on which the performance of the quid pro quo quo is completed” (Article 2(1)1 of the said Act shall be the date on which

2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow