The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The lower court determined that the Defendant was guilty of misunderstanding of facts, even though the Defendant was raped or quasi-raped twice on May 30, 2013 and June 1, 2013 on two occasions, and the Defendant was not guilty.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. On June 1, 2013, the lower court argued that: (a) the Defendant was aware of the fact that he was sexual assaulted by F on or around June 1, 2013; (b) it is difficult to readily understand that he was sexual intercourse with F, who is the perpetrator of sexual assault, without any specific reflect; (c) the Defendant used the word “sexual assault” in the Defendant’s currency and recognized the fact that he was sexual assaulting the Defendant; (d) however, at the time of the said call, the Defendant first used the word “Rape and quasi-Rape”; (c) it cannot be deemed that F was sexual assaulting by the said circumstance alone; (d) it is difficult to view that F was sexual assaulting by the Defendant to the extent that the Defendant was sexual assaulting by 0.3,00,00, and that it was difficult to view that F was sexually rape or quasi-rapeing by 10:30,000,000 on or around 10, 201.