1. The part against the defendant among the judgment of the court of first instance is revoked, and the plaintiff's claim corresponding to the revoked part is revoked.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a mutual aid business entity that entered into a motor vehicle mutual aid agreement with the Plaintiff to compensate for damage caused by an accident during the operation of the Plaintiff-owned B cab (hereinafter “Plaintiff-owned taxi”), and the Defendant is an insurer that entered into a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance agreement with the Defendant with respect to Dystren car owned by C (hereinafter “Defendant-owned taxi”).

B. At around 20:20 on March 19, 2010, E, the driver of the Plaintiff taxi, is proceeding about 35 km each hour by using one lane between the two-lanes in the front of the home flusium in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Sejong Special Self-Governing City, and the two-lanes in front of the home flusium in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do (which is now applicable to the Dong flusium in Sejong Special Self-Governing City, Sejong Special Self-Governing City) from the

전방 좌우를 잘 살피지 않은 채 유턴을 하는 과정에서 원고 택시 반대 차선에서 직진하는 G 운전의 H 승용차의 앞 범퍼 부분을 원고 택시의 우측면으로 충돌하였고, 이로 인하여 원고 택시가 전복되면서 튕겨나가 홈플러스 방면에서 조치원 읍내 방면으로 진행하기 위해 정차하고 있던 C 운전의 피고 차량의 좌측면을 충돌하는 사고(이하 ‘이 사건 사고’라 한다)를 일으켰다.

C. As a result of the instant accident, F, who was aboard the Plaintiff taxi, was injured by approximately 12 weeks of injury, such as cutting down the right pelke and cutting down the pelke, etc., and the Plaintiff paid the F, from May 27, 2010 to August 8, 2013, a total of KRW 60,211,140,00, under the pretext of medical treatment or agreement.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 3 through 5 (including branch numbers, hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence 1, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Judgment on the plaintiff's claim

A. The place where the Plaintiff alleged the instant accident occurred is a zone where parking or stopping is prohibited under the law, and the vehicle is at a high risk of accidents due to the interned vehicle, and thus the vehicle stops or stops.