The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On September 26, 2017, the summary of the facts charged: (a) the Defendant: (b) provided an assault to the victim on the victim’s face on the ground that he/she made a statement about the victim’s face on the ground that he/she made a statement about the victim’s face while drinking alcohol with four employees, including the victim D (48 tax) and exchanged with the company designation issues related to the website of the Small and Medium Enterprise Convergence Federation, even though he/she was not appropriate to answer; and (c) made a statement about the victim’s face on the ground that he/she made a statement about the victim’s face.

2. The instant facts charged are the crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. The victim expressed his/her wish not to punish the Defendant on December 13, 2017, which was the date of instituting the prosecution.

Therefore, the prosecution is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.