A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 201, the Defendant stated at C University Human Resources Development Institute that “Around September 201, the Defendant would make sure that the victim D would be able to take an influent examination, etc., which is a qualification certificate related to the computer database if the payment is made.”

However, the defendant was willing to use the money received from the injured party for living expenses and hospital expenses, and even if he was paid the money from the injured party, there was no intention to have the injured party take the qualifying examination, etc.

As above, the Defendant, as well as the receipt of KRW 500,00 from the injured party, by deceiving the victims as above, and the receipt of KRW 500,00 from the injured party, was made through deception of the attached Table 1, from that time to April 12, 2012, by deceiving the victims as above and obtaining KRW 16,705,00 through a total of 13 times from the victims.

2. On March 25, 2012, the Defendant is required to provide the victim D with telecommunications equipment, such as Aamp and Audio, at E Education Center located in Gangnam-gu Seoul on March 25, 2012.

Along with the opening of the telecommunications equipment, the telecommunications equipment will be paid in full on the opening, installment, amount of use, penalty, etc., and when the project is completed, the telecommunications equipment, such as ambal and ambalon, were returned.

However, in fact, the defendant did not proceed with the project with the subsidization of the national expenses, even if the injured party opened the communication device, there was no intention to pay the victim the opening of the communication device, and there was no intention to return the communication device to the victim.

As above, the Defendant, as well as the Defendant, by deceiving the victim and being issued one observer mobile phone owned by the victim, which is equivalent to KRW 99,900,00 from the victim, on the same day, and by deceiving the victims by the aforementioned method from the time to August 27, 2012, as shown in Table 2 of the List of Crimes attached hereto.