logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2020.06.26 2020고정245
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a BLI truck.

On 14:39 on 30, 2020, the Defendant driven the above vehicle, leading up to the high view of the D three-distance adjacent to Goyang-gu C in Goyangyang-gu, Seoyang-gu.

Since there are three streets where signal apparatus is installed, the defendant engaged in the driving duty has a duty of care to drive safely according to the new code.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the front part of the left side of the F military vehicle of the victim E (Nam, 20 years old) driving, which was left left from the 1052 unit on the right side of the F military vehicle of the victim E (Nam, 20 years old), from the 1052 unit, due to the negligence of violating and straighting the signal.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence, stated the injury of salt, tensions, etc. to the victim G (Namnam and 22 years old), who is the chief Easter of the damaged vehicle, in the light of the trend that requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and the indictment for a tension and a tension, as the “scopical and scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scops”

(21 pages of investigation records). Each injury was suffered by each investigation record.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a medical certificate stating the defendant's legal statement, a fact-finding report on the occurrence of traffic accidents, and a report on the internal investigation of accident images;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes Act;

1. Selection of selective fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the confinement of a workhouse;

1. In light of the circumstances and contents of the crime for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant stated that it is against the recognition of the facts charged.

arrow