Defendants shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Punishment of the crime

On August 2, 2017, the Defendants entered the “F” office where the victim E was working in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, as of August 22, 2017, and entered the entrance that was not corrected for the purpose of receiving expenses incurred by the victim who did not meet the contact with the Defendants while avoiding contact with the Defendants.

As a result, the Defendants jointly intruded on the office where the victim was employed.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements (the second public trial date)

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (as to “Kakao Stockholm” message and attachment of photographs), investigation reports (as to reporting telephone conversations with the complainants)

1. The Defendants: Article 2(2)1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 319(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 319(1) of the same Act, the selection of fines

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. The Defendants subject to suspended execution: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the Defendants recognized all the facts charged in the instant case and against the mistake, and the Defendants infringed on the office of the instant case where they did not locked and did not have any person, and the Defendants appear to have committed a crime under the lack of awareness of illegality, and there are circumstances to be taken into account in the course of the crime; the Defendants agreed with the victims; the Defendants did not have any particular criminal record other than once a fine is imposed on Defendant A; and Defendant B did not have a first criminal record).