The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the gist of the grounds for appeal: (a) the confession and reflect of the defendant; (b) the defendant provided active cooperation in investigation by informing an investigative agency of narcotics-related crimes; (c) the defendant does not punish the defendant by agreement with the victim of traffic accident D; (d) the defendant escaped after the escape; (e) the defendant voluntarily surrenders after the occurrence of traffic accident; and (e) the defendant is in a position to support his family; and (e) the punishment (one year of imprisonment and one hundred thousand won of penalty) imposed by the court below is too

2. Taking account of the circumstances alleged by the Defendant, each of the instant crimes was committed by the Defendant while driving a motor vehicle under the influence of 0.122% of blood alcohol concentration, and with the negligence of entering the same lane as one-lane, resulting in an injury to the victim, such as crums, tensions, etc. requiring approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and at the same time, the said motor vehicle was parked without taking measures such as destroying and damaging approximately KRW 1,64,483 of repair cost to rescue the victim, and then stopping the said motor vehicle and providing relief. The case was about 0.03g of phiphonephonephones, and the case was not easy. The drinking driving is an offense that may cause damage to the life and property of the victim as well as the driver, and it is necessary to strictly punish the same by reflecting the purport of the revision of the Road Traffic Act, such as the Act’s amendment, and the Act’s amendment, in particular, the fact that the Defendant has been sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for 20 years or more (one-half of punishment).