logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.08.31 2017고정853
업무상과실치사등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B A corporation is a corporation established with the head office of 1101 in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D building, and is a corporation owner who performs construction works of D building located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government in the amount of KRW 5,652,900,000 on a contractual basis from F to March 31, 2017.

Defendant

A is a safety and health manager who controls and manages safety matters, such as interest on a field manager who directly manages and supervises the site of the said “new construction of D building” performed by the said Defendant B Company, and measures to prevent harm and danger to his/her employees.

1. On October 21, 2016, Defendant A around 11:50 on the 6th floor of the construction site located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Defendant A had the victim G (the victim 59 years old) (the victim she is South and North) work as a steel shed in the creshes of the pit pumps (floshes) connected to the outer wall of the 6th floor of the building.

The defendant, who is responsible for the safety of the above construction site, has a duty of care to prevent the accidents caused by the fall from the fall by installing a work plate by means of assembling the vision, etc. in the case of conducting work on the outer wall of the sixth floor of the building in which the victim is likely to fall.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and without installing a work board, caused the victim to do so on the outer wall of the sixth floor of the building in danger of falling, thereby causing the victim to fall on the floor.

The Defendant, as seen above, did not take necessary measures to prevent accidents caused by fall, caused the victim to die due to multiple prolonged damage caused by fall.

2. Defendant B, at the same time and place as in the preceding paragraph, did not take safety measures to prevent industrial accidents of workers as in the preceding paragraph in relation to the Defendant’s business.

Summary of Evidence

1..

arrow