A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Criminal facts

On August 8, 2016, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim on the ground that the victim D (L, 50 years old) was not repaid the money borrowed from the Defendant in front of the victim D (L, 50 years old) around the 108-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-gu,

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 311 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The statement made by the Defendant guilty of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order is recognized as a performance for the following reasons.

At the time when the defendant made the statement as stated in its holding, there was no other person than E, who is the defendant's seat. However, in the vicinity of the apartment management office in the judgment of the defendant, the defendant made an insulting speech as stated in its judgment as a large interest by leaving the victim's name, and in light of the place and method of the crime, there is a possibility that other person was in addition to E, and the actual victim appeared to have made the statement in the vicinity of the apartment.

E did not have a special relationship with the victim, but did not have a separate relationship between the victim and the victim.

was testified.

Therefore, the facts charged in the instant case are sufficient to be found guilty.