1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The following facts are acknowledged in full view of each of the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, 11, 16, and 20 of the basic facts:

[1] Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) is a company that publishes teaching materials for children, and Defendant C is the representative director of Defendant Company.

From September 2003, the Plaintiff operated Internet Cafin D that criticizes Defendant Company from September 2003 to the next Dum on its website.

Around October 2003, Defendant C filed a complaint against the Plaintiff on behalf of the Defendant Company as defamation, interference with business, or attempted attack.

The contents of the above complaint (hereinafter referred to as "the complaint of this case") are as follows: "The plaintiff below the above Internet camera". The complaint of this case (hereinafter referred to as "the complaint of this case").

(2) On March 25, 2004, 2007, 2000, 2000 won, 200,000 won, 30,000 won, 200,000 won, 30,000,000 won, 30,000,000,000 won, and 30,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000,00,00,00,00,00.

‘The purpose was to the end, but was not complied with by E, and thus was to have attempted to commit official conflicts.

After filing an appeal against the above judgment, the appeal was withdrawn, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on May 14, 2004.

[3] After that, the plaintiff filed a request for a retrial against the above final judgment and acquitted him/her of defamation and obstruction of business on June 3, 2010.