logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.03.30 2017구합6983
정직처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff was appointed as a public official in general service on December 2, 1985, and was promoted to an administrative assistant on October 8, 1999.

From September 15, 2014 to September 26, 2017, the Plaintiff served in the Daejeon Regional Employment and Labor Office, and served in the Gwangju Regional Employment and Labor Office from September 27, 2017.

B. 1) The Daejeon Regional Labor Agency: (a) deemed that the Plaintiff violated Articles 56 (Duty of Good Faith) and 63 (Duty to Maintain Dignity) of the State Public Officials Act due to grounds for disciplinary action as follows; (b) requested the Ministry of Employment and Labor to make a resolution on disciplinary action against the Plaintiff pursuant to Article 78(1) of the State Public Officials Act. The Ministry of Employment and Labor decided to dismiss the Plaintiff on March 20, 2015; and (c) on March 24, 2015, the Defendant decided to dismiss the Plaintiff on March 24, 2015 (hereinafter “previous disciplinary action”).

(1) On June 2012, from June 201 to July 2014, the Plaintiff: (a) had sexual intercourses between B and B, one time a month, and two times each month; (b) had the head of the Tong from 2012 to deposit KRW 5 million each month in the name of B; (c) had the head of the Tong deposited KRW 200,000 per month; (d) had B send pictures on a daily basis from October 21, 2013 to B; (b) had the head of the Si/Gun/Gu reported the violation of the duty to maintain dignity; and (c) had the Plaintiff actively reported the violation of the duty to cooperate with B on July 14, 2014 by having the Ministry of Employment and Labor reported the violation of the duty to cooperate with B, and (d) had the Plaintiff reported the violation of the duty to cooperate with B, such as having the Ministry of Audit and Inspection reported the violation of the duty to cooperate with B.14.

arrow