The punishment of the accused shall be determined by two years of imprisonment.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 11, 2013, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (injury by collective action, deadly weapons, etc.) (hereinafter referred to as "the Defendant") committed an act in violation of Article 24(1) of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act by drinking his/her daily behaviors and drinking with his/her own alcohol and drinking with his/her mother, but on the ground that he/she does not come to her woman, he/she went to the instant singing room at the entrance of the said singing room on the face of hand and carried out a small amount of illness in the instant singing room. While the Defendant was a proprietor G (29 years of age) who was in the instant singing box, and the Defendant reported it, the Defendant took the Defendant into consideration, and the victim took care of the victim by taking the victim's injuries, such as flading him/her one time with his/her for a dangerous object, and by taking the victim's assault, blading him/her and drinking him/her, etc., during the instant period.

2. On October 11, 2013, the Defendant of special obstruction of performance of official duties: (a) around 01:46, at the place indicated in the foregoing paragraph (1), the police officer I and J, who was called the police station, upon receiving a report that “a breathous weapon is dangerous in drinking,” interfered with the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the on-site movement of a police officer by taking advantage of the police officer I and J, to confirm the fact of damage to the above G and to verify the fact that the Defendant was different from the Defendant; and (b) to the above police officer, “a 10 meters away from the 10 meters away.” The Defendant stated that “a breathic disease, which is a dangerous object cited in the two hand, shall be limited to a fine for the obstruction of performance of official duties.” The Defendant interfered with the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the on-site movement of a police officer by taking advantage of the above I and threatening him for about 20 minutes

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning G; and

1. A statement prepared in the I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to entries in a written injury diagnosis;

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

(a) The point of carrying a deadly weapon: Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

B. The obstruction of performance of official duties by carrying dangerous articles as stated.