The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The defendant's mistake is recognized and reflected in his judgment.

The defendant has a intellectual disability of class 3, which seems to have a certain degree of influence on the crime of this case.

However, there are a number of criminal records (including two times the actual criminal records) for the defendant, and even though criminal punishment procedures were in progress due to the crime ofless fraud similar to the crime of this case, the defendant committed the crime of this case again despite the fact that he committed the crime of this case, he used violence to employees C and G who driven by the defendant to receive alcoholic beverages, and the victims and victims could not reach the recovery and agreement, there are no special circumstances to change the sentence of the court below, and there are no other special circumstances to change the sentence of the court below, and considering all the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case, it cannot be deemed unfair since the sentence of the court below is too too too too unreasonable. Thus, the above argument by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.