beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On June 2, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim E at the D coffee shop located in Bupyeong-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City, that “a loan guarantee is offered as security, and KRW 3,000,000,00,000,00 of land owned by the outside third village G in Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Incheon, and paid KRW 30% of the remaining gains by selling and selling the said land. To obtain a loan, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim E that “The money to pay the overdue credit card payment is required.”
However, even if the victim receives money from the victim, the G did not have any intention or ability to pay the overdue credit card payment.
The Defendant, from the victim, 4 million won on the same day under the pretext of repayment of overdue payment by credit card in the above G, and the same year.
6. 5.2 million won, and the same year;
6. 23.1 million won, and the same year.
7. 15.3.1 million won, and the same year.
7. The sum of KRW 15 million was transferred to an account in the name of the Defendant (H) in the aggregate of KRW 4.9 million on 25.4 million.
Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim to take the property by deceiving the victim.
2. On October 14, 2014, the Defendant phoneed the victim E on the road in front of the marina farm store located in the Namyang-si, Namyang-si, 2014, and concluded that “A land owned by G was sold at KRW 11.4 billion to I without obtaining a loan from the water cooperative and paid all remainder to I, and was closed down due to the access road. If the land owner loans KRW 5.0 million, which is urgently required by G, the payment of the purchase price of the said land would be made as deposited and the land owner would invest KRW 200,000,000,000,000,000,000 won, out of the 1.3 billion, from the land owner.”
However, there was no intention or ability to repay the G-owned land in return for the loan from the victim, because the G-owned land was sold to I or the balance was not received.
The Defendant received KRW 5 million from the victim to the single bank account under the name of the said Defendant in the name of G immediately as the living expenses of G.
In this respect, the defendant deceivings the victim to take property.