1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. On January 2015, the Plaintiff asserted that: (a) performed the construction work by re-subcontracting from the New Changwon Co., Ltd., Ltd., which was awarded a subcontract for the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction of the Construction

However, the non-party company rejected the plaintiff's claim for the re-work payment because the cause of re-work was caused by the plaintiff's work loss.

The Defendant promised to allow the Plaintiff to receive the construction cost from the non-party company for the instant re-operation.

If the re-work in this case is caused by the mistake of the non-party company, the defendant, as a field manager, should have the non-party company pay the plaintiff the re-work price. If the plaintiff's fault is caused by the plaintiff's fault, the plaintiff, an employer, suffered damages equivalent to KRW 31,190,000 due to the defendant'

The defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff damages amounting to 31,190,000 won and damages for delay.

2. The statement of No. 2 of the judgment alone is obliged to make the non-party company pay the price for the re-operation of the instant case to the Defendant.

It is insufficient to recognize that the defendant, who is an employee, was responsible for damages against the plaintiff in the course of performing his/her duties, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Rather, according to the result of the inquiry of the non-party company of this court, the non-party company shall consult with the director, the managing director, and the representative director who are the plaintiff's employees.