Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates Dlaundry in the case of Pakistan.

When a foreigner intends to be employed in the Republic of Korea, he/she shall obtain the status of stay that allows him/her to engage in job-seeking activities, and no person shall employ a person who does not have the above status of stay, but the defendant from March 27, 2014 to the same year

4. Until September 29, 200, the said “Dlaundry” place of business, namely, foreigners E and F of Vietnam, who had no status of sojourn for visiting and staying in the said place of business and who had no status of sojourn for job-seeking activities, had employed 50,000 won at the time, and who did not have the status of sojourn for job-seeking activities, entered into the status of stay for visa exemption (B-1) and did not have the status of sojourn for job-seeking activities.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement (third time);

1. Each notice of decision on examining an immigration offender;

1. Each written statement of employment;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the written accusation;

1. Article 94 Subparag. 9 of the Immigration Control Act and Article 18(3) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense [the sentence was imposed in consideration of the following facts: (a) the person who has the same or similar power as an excessive one; (b) the person who has a large number of illegal employees is disadvantageous; (c) the period of employment was not significantly long; and (d) the person who has a minor number of illegal employees appears to have not yet been considered as to some illegal employees; and (c) the defendant’s economic situation was determined by

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.