logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2013.07.16 2012고단1130
사기
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. The Defendant, from around 2003, is a company F, the representative of E, and a person who has overall control over the construction as the site director of H apartment construction when G is a permanent resident of H apartment construction executed by G.

On August 20, 2004, the Defendant had difficulties in raising funds, such as the F Company’s default on August 20, 2004, and the decision of voluntary decision of commencement of the auction on the H apartment site was rendered on January 3, 2005, and the construction was suspended, and failure to recover the construction cost of H apartment already implemented by the F Company.

On November 28, 2005, the Defendant concluded a sales contract for the H apartment site and building site and building with H apartment site and the household to be sold to 12 billion won in the 12 billion won per contract, and KRW 500 million in the face of 300 million, the ownership transfer to provide the H apartment site and building as collateral and to receive a loan from a financial institution, and the remainder 9 billion shall be able to sell the apartment and pay the amount of apartment as substitute property at the L law office located in K at the permanent residence of the same month. The Defendant concluded a sales contract for the H apartment site and building with the victim as “F, M,” and received a cashier’s checks of KRW 300 million at the face value of the same day.

However, in fact, the defendant was entrusted with the sale of the H apartment site and building from E, or did not have any intention or ability to transfer the ownership of the H apartment site and building to the victims.

Accordingly, the Defendant was informed of the victims by deceiving them.

2. Reasons for innocence;

A. According to the evidence duly admitted and examined, the following facts are acknowledged.

① The Defendant, from around 2003, is a site manager of G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “G”), and is below F.

arrow