logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2016.08.25 2016고단375
상표법위반등
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1.5 million.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2016 Highest 375] Defendant B is a person engaged in trade business, and Defendant A is a "D organization."

No one shall deliver, sell, forge, imitate, or possess a trademark identical or similar to another person's registered trademark for the purpose of using or making another person use such trademark on goods identical or similar to the designated goods.

1. Defendant B

A. From around August 2015 to the end of the same month, the Defendant sold 1,250,000 won in total a total of three to four times in the vicinity of the mid-gu sports center in which he/she was engaged in the act of acting in Sungnam-si, and the registration number of No. 40-083010 of the trademark holder who was a trademark right holder by J&D L&D’s registration number of No. 40-3010 of the trademark registration No. 40-083010.

B. On October 2, 2015, the Defendant sold KRW 6.75 million in total, and KRW 1.550,000 in total, 180,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won

Accordingly, the defendant infringed the trademark right of the above trademark right holder.

2. Defendant A

A. As described in paragraph 1, the Defendant purchased the Dominton’s PICR “VICR” from B without permission, and sold to E and F the above Dominton’s Council for Persons with Disabilities (“E and F”), in both weeks of “insansan Dominton’s stadium located in Masan-dong, Sungnam-si around October 3, 2015,” the Defendant sold the above Dominton’s 1 million won in total to E and F.

B. On October 4, 2015, the Defendant provided 80 scamets and 150 scams for the said scams, which were managed by the Defendant, to the instant scam scam in the instant scam stadium stadium games and the prizes of the scam scams, which are the president of the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant infringed the trademark right of the trademark right holder of the above Paragraph 1.

[2016 Highest 1222] Defendant A drafted a false accusation against B around October 16, 2015.

The letter of accusation is "Seongnam-si."

arrow