logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.07.26 2019고단1329
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years, and for ten months, for each of the defendants B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 9, 2016, Defendant B, who had been sentenced to two years of imprisonment for fraud in the Suwon District Court's Ansan Branch, was released on June 29, 2018 and passed on August 7, 2018 during the execution of the sentence.

Criminal facts

1. Defendant A’s name in the Chinese territory, etc. (hereinafter “C”) established and operated a call center for committing a telephone financial fraud (hereinafter “singing”; hereinafter “singing”), and ordered the Defendant to receive and transfer the amount of damage from the victim, etc., and the Defendant conspired with each other to perform the act of collecting the amount of damage from the victim or the amount of damage upon receiving the withdrawal of the amount of damage from the victim, etc. in accordance with the aforementioned C’s proposal known to the Defendant around August 2018.

On February 21, 2019, an employee in the name of Bosing Scam called to the victim D and misrepresented to act as an agent for the E associationF, and made a false statement to the effect that “on the current low interest rate loan is possible, it is possible to obtain a credit card loan due to a lack of credit rating, and make a loan by raising the credit point by immediately repaying the loan, and remitting money to a redemption account designated for receipt of card loan,” and then, the employee in this context made the victim transfer the credit card loan of KRW 12 million from G card to B (H) account in the name of the E association (H).

In accordance with the above C’s order, the Defendant received KRW 12 million from B who withdrawn the above amount of damage in front of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on the same day at around 15:17, and then remitted the above KRW 12 million to a non-deposit account designated by C using the ATM device in the vicinity of the same day.

As a result, the defendant, in collusion with C et al.'s employees in charge of scaming, deceiving the victim and obtained 12 million won from the victim.

2. The defendant B is the defendant A and B.

arrow