logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2019.09.18 2017가합48761
구상금
Text

1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 219,993,060 with respect to the Plaintiff and the period from June 23, 2018 to May 31, 2019.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Status 1 of the Parties) The Plaintiff is the Esch Rexrothed vehicle owned by D (hereinafter “Insurance Vehicle”).

(2) Defendant B is the owner of F Uidi vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant vehicle”).

B. A traffic accident occurred. Around 03:20 on October 11, 2016, Defendant C driven the Defendant’s vehicle and driven the 5 side intersection in the direction of Busan Dong-dong along the three-lanes in the direction of Busan Dong-dong from the west-dong to the direction of Busan, and caused an accident of operating the 5 side intersection in the direction of Busan dong-dong to shock the said intersection at a higher level as at the end of the centralized at the end of the centralized (hereinafter “instant accident”).

2) As a result of the instant accident, G (D) having been accompanied by the Defendant’s vehicle suffered injury, such as blood strokes under acute strokes, the closure of the head and the bones floor, and blood strokes under external strokes.

C. 1) The Defendant vehicle is the Defendant Company at the time of the instant accident (hereinafter “H”).

(2) The Plaintiff paid the insurance money of KRW 74,93,060 (i.e., KRW 64,549,820 (i.e., KRW 58,130,230, KRW 64,41,230, KRW 648,418,590) to G in accordance with the special agreement on indemnity against non-life insurance among the comprehensive automobile insurance contracts entered into with D, and paid the insurance money of KRW 309,93,060 (hereinafter “instant insurance money”) to H in total, by paying the amount exceeding the insurance amount to be borne by the Defendant’s liability insurer under the said liability insurance contract) around July 28, 2017.

3) Meanwhile, the Plaintiff recovered KRW 90,000,000 from H, which is the liability insurer of the Defendant vehicle. [Grounds for recognition] The Plaintiff did not dispute any of the grounds for recognition, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 8, Eul evidence Nos. 2 and 5 (including each number number; hereinafter the same shall apply).

each entry, whole pleading, or any other statement.

arrow