beta
Text
1. The fact that E died at the Gaba Gaba Gaba Gaba Gaba Gaba Gaba Gaba Gaba Gaba Gaba f in the Gambae-si
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On June 20, 2017, E entered into an insurance contract (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”) with the Plaintiff as indicated in the separate sheet.
B. According to the instant insurance contract and the insurance terms and conditions incorporated therein, the Plaintiff is obliged to pay the general injury death insurance amount of KRW 100,000 to the statutory successors of the case where E died as a direct result of the injury inflicted upon the body of the body of the body of the deceased (except for death caused by a disease) due to a sudden and remote accident during the insurance period (hereinafter “instant accident”). C. On April 13, 2018, E took part in a mountain gathering on April 13, 2018, and visited G deaths in the Gsaeba F in the Geman-si Si Sim-si on April 14, 2018 on the same day. On April 14, 2018, the following day was discovered after the death of the deceased’s body as a direct death, “unexploded,” the type of death, and the death of the deceased’s body was entered in the body death report made on the day of death as a result of the death of the deceased’s cerebr or cerebr.
E. As the Deceased died on April 14, 2018, Defendant B, C, and D, his husband, succeeded to the deceased’s property.
[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1-7 (including virtual number), the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The assertion and judgment
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the deceased died due to resistant diseases, such as high blood pressure and urology, which is a disease, and thus, he cannot be deemed to have caused a sudden and incidental accident. Therefore, the Plaintiff is not obliged to pay the Defendant the death benefit of injury.
B. The causal relationship in the judgment 1 civil dispute is not a medical natural and scientific causal relationship, but a social and legal causal relationship, so the causal relationship is not necessarily a clear medical and natural science, and this is not necessarily a clear proof.