The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On April 11, 2017, the Defendant was present at the court of Seosan Branch of Daejeon District Court No. 108, which is located in Seosan City 4-24, Seosan City 4:40 on April 11, 2017, and took an oath against the Defendant’s injury case No. 2016, 2016, 262, as a witness of the said court, and then, the Defendant’s defense counsel’s “the fact that the Defendant shut down this window.”

I cannot answer the question "..."

The public prosecutor’s “I” answer, and the public prosecutor’s “Is the witness, regardless of E-Creat, do not see any sound that the windows of the day are closed or closed.

“Top, top, topend, the question.”

There is no door to the prosecutor's question "whether or not the defendant would not be closed or there is no open door to close." The prosecutor's question "whether or not the defendant would not be closed later, or not there is no open door to close."

If the proposal was to be observed from the beginning, it is required that it be observed.

The answer was made by the prosecutor to the effect that “If the testimony of the witness is arranged, the witness was reported at the time of the instant case to keep the situation in the vicinity of the entrance and exit 3 times at the time of the instant case, but the statement was not closed once,” and the statement was asked to the effect that “A witness appeared at the beginning of the date, and the window was not closed,” and the testimony was made to the effect that “I would like to answer the situation from the beginning of the date, and because the window was not closed, I would like to say that D would not have any son’s finger in the door of the window.”

However, the fact that D closes the door-to-door gambling windows, and the fingers of E interfered with the gap of windows.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

2. In light of the following circumstances revealed by the records of determination, the instant facts charged was proven without reasonable doubt only by the evidence submitted by the prosecution.

It is insufficient to view it, and otherwise,.