The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for six months) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances favorable to the defendant include the fact that the defendant led to the crime, the amount of damage is a relatively small amount, and the defendant committed the crime of this case in a state of mental disorder as a mental retardation of a serious symptoms.

On the other hand, the fact that the defendant had been punished several times as larcenys, and that the crime of this case was committed during the period of probation, and that the damage has not been recovered is disadvantageous to the defendant.

In full view of the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, occupation, motive, means and consequence of the commission of the crime, the frequency of the commission of the crime, and the circumstances after the commission of the crime, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.