Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, the Defendants did not pay the fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. Although Defendant A is not allowed to provide or lease a private car for transport with compensation, the Defendant is the owner of the passenger car in the CF Habaland, and the Defendant, from August 10, 2016 to September 23, 2016, received KRW 130,000 per month from the International Catho School in the 28-ro, such as the Government Satho, from August 10, 2016 to September 28, 2016, to send the said student to the said school by using the said passenger car.

Accordingly, the defendant provided cars for private use owned by the defendant for transportation with compensation.

2. Although Defendant B is not allowed to provide or lease a private car for transport with compensation, the Defendant is the owner of D-wing and Coincom III, and the Defendant was to receive KRW 1,300,000 from August 10, 2016 to September 20, 201, for one month from the International C-Support School in 28, i.e., the Government of the Republic of Korea from August 10, 2016 to September 20, and to send the said student to the said school using the said D-wing vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant provided cars for private use owned by the defendant for transportation with compensation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Notification to a department in charge of reporting 112 cases and registration certificates;

1. Operating photographs of the vehicle;

1. Application of an inquiry letter, such as criminal history, and reporting on the result of confirmation before and after the disposition;

1. Defendants who choose the relevant legal provisions and punishment for criminal facts: Articles 90 and 81 of the Passenger Transport Service Act and the choice of fines

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are examined, and the Defendants recognized the criminal facts of the instant case and against their mistake, etc. are recognized as favorable circumstances to the Defendants.

However, in light of the contents and methods of the crime, the legislative intent of the Passenger Transport Service Act, etc., the crime in this case is not less than that of the crime, and the defendant B.