1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is the same as the part of the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following cases. Thus, this is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

After the 10th of the 2th judgment of the first instance court, the “definite” shall be added to “influence, such as infinites, infinites, misappropriations, waste refinites, waste refinites, waste refinites, waste refinites, etc.” and the “defin

B. On 3th 15th 15th 201, the first instance court held that “A potential disease has occurred” was that “In response, it occurred on October 24, 2009, i.e., cardiopulmonary e., acute e., acute e., acute e., depression, etc., again occurred on October 28, 2012.”

(c) 6 pages 5 of the first instance court's decision is referring to 6 pages 5 to 'Sechopa-dong and chronological flafing.'

According to the judgment of the first instance court 5, the following 7 acts include “patherter, high blood pressure, cardiopulmonary hemoperology, urology, high blood pressure, dypology, and so on” (i.e., pulmonary dypology), and “pulmonary dypology, cardiopulmonary dypology, pulmonary dypology, pulmonary dypology, etc.)”.

(e) 6 pages 14, 14, following the first instance court:

(C) The Seoul Medical Center’s appraisal commission to the Seoul Medical Center is based on (1) but the operation of 4 hours may lead to the increase of blood pressure due to sufficient stress. (2) Overwork or stress may put the blood pressure into blood pressure, and may serve as the risk of acute cardiopulmonary eculation. (3) Although self-driving is likely to bring the blood pressure, it is difficult to readily conclude that it causes a complication. (4 deceaseds are accompanied by high blood pressure, cardiopulmonary urology, urology, etc. (in addition to high blood pressure, cardiopulmonary urology, the risk of cardiopulmonary urology is higher than that of cardiopulmonary and urology.

“”

(f) 6 pages of the judgment of the first instance court [based on recognition] are written in the evidence (including paper numbers) Nos. 18 to 21 of A, the result of the commission of appraisal to the Seoul Medical Center of the court of the first instance.