1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 10, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an application for refugee status with the Defendant on November 10, 2015 while entering the Republic of Korea as a short-term visit (C-3) sojourn status on October 30, 2015.

B. On March 16, 2017, the Defendant rendered a decision of non-recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff could not be recognized “ sufficiently based fears that would be detrimental to persecution” as prescribed by Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.

C. On April 17, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on April 17, 2017, but rendered a final decision dismissing the Plaintiff’s application on October 11, 2017.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2 and 4, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the legitimacy of the disposition

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is that the Plaintiff’s family is a member of the class, and around January 2009, the Plaintiff’s additional members left the branch of the local church where many Musscinscinies reside, and their families moved to the same.

After that, the plaintiff was raped on the ground that he was a slockist from a man with no slock on his identity, and the slocks caused the plaintiff's mother and male birth, and the plaintiff's father died of slocks.

Therefore, the defendant's disposition of this case which did not recognize the plaintiff as a refugee is unlawful even though it is highly likely that the plaintiff might be stuffed from local slurgical slurgs when the plaintiff return to

B. In full view of the following circumstances, it is insufficient to view that there is a well-founded fear of persecution to the Plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.

The defendant's disposition of this case is legitimate.

The 1stmaria is a religion under the Constitution.