beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, each of the defendants B and E, and each of the defendants C and D shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of eight months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
On August 27, 2009, A was sentenced to one year of imprisonment and two years of suspended execution due to a violation of the Illegal Check Control Act by the Seoul Western District Court, and the judgment was finalized on September 4, 2009.
Defendant
A was the representative director of H, Defendant E was the director of the above corporation H, who was in charge of the management of the company’s funds as a director of H, Defendant B, and Defendant C was the person who operated K and sold construction materials. Both Defendant B, D, and C were the employees of H and are engaged in the same industry after retirement.
On the other hand, the corporate financing system is introduced to reduce the use of bills and expand cash settlement, and the purchasing enterprise receives a cash loan from a financial institution under the guarantee of the Korea Credit Guarantee Fund instead of paying the price for the goods with the bills sold by the purchasing enterprise, and the financial institution loans to the financial institution shall be paid directly to the selling enterprise and the purchasing enterprise shall recover the price for the goods from the selling enterprise at an early stage by having the financial institution repay the funds.
Defendant
A In the course of operating H with the guarantee of the Korea Credit Guarantee Fund from around 1990 and with the loan of corporate purchase funds from the victim KB bank, a formal examination is conducted by only submitting a tax invoice issued by the party concerned without actual transaction or actual verification of the source of the loan, etc. when the above victim bank terminates the shortage of corporate fund, and the bank provides the loan, and then the loan is conducted by Defendant E, B, D, and C using the fact that the loan was made. Although H did not purchase the goods such as the first-day contact from the above I, J, and K, it issued a false tax invoice, and then issued a false tax invoice as if it was purchased.