Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On May 24, 2017, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea with a short-term visit (C-3) sojourn status on May 24, 2017, and applied for refugee status to the Defendant on August 1, 2017.
B. On February 23, 2018, the Defendant rendered a decision on the recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that the Plaintiff’s assertion does not constitute a case of “a well-founded fear that would be subject to persecution” as a requirement of refugee under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees.
C. The Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on March 23, 2018, but the said objection was dismissed on the same ground as on September 14, 2018.
[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 3, 4 evidence, Eul 1 and 2 evidence, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. Family members are threatening to the Plaintiff on the ground that the Plaintiff asserted that he was married to the Islamic Republic of Islamic Republic of Korea.
Therefore, the defendant's disposition of this case which did not recognize the plaintiff as a refugee despite high possibility that the plaintiff would be subject to gambling when he returns to the country of nationality is illegal.
B. Determination 1) “Refugee” refers to a foreigner who is unable or does not want to be protected due to well-founded fear that he/she may be harmed on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, status as a member of a specific social group, or political opinion, or a foreigner who is not able to return to, or does not want to return to, a country in which he/she had resided before entering the Republic of Korea due to such fear (Article 2 Subparag. 1). 2 of the Refugee Act), which is a requirement for the recognition of refugee status, refers to “an act causing serious infringement of, or discrimination against, essential human dignity, including threats to life, body, or freedom,” and such a well-founded ground is.