beta
Text
1. The Defendants are jointly and severally and severally liable to the Plaintiff 1.5 billion won and the interest rate of 15% per annum from October 20, 2017 to the date of full payment.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. E and F Co., Ltd. 1) E, net G, and H are Co., Ltd. F (hereinafter “F”) on May 7, 1997
3) On the part of Ansan-si, I Forest Land 109,38 square meters (the public land portion is E 49,619/109,388 shares, G 54,694/109,38 shares, H 5,075/109,38 shares) and 11 shares (hereinafter “the forest of this case”).
(2) On June 2, 1998, E, net G, and H agreed to the effect that “in the event that F was unable to pay the land price by August 15, 1998 at the time of payment of the land price, the land and all rights except the project cost invested in the project (J) shall be transferred free of charge to E, net G, and H, and on June 3, 1998, the following day the registration of ownership transfer was completed in Suwon District Court’s receipt of the Suwon District Court’s receipt of the instant forest land as to F on June 3, 1998.
3) However, by August 15, 1998, F did not pay the remaining balance to E, etc. 4) F sold the instant forest land, etc. to K Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “K”) and L Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “L”), and thereafter, L purchased the instant forest land, etc. to K was entrusted to M Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “M”).
B. 1) F filed a lawsuit against M, L, and K seeking the implementation of the procedure for the registration of cancellation of ownership transfer registration of the forest of this case by the Seoul Central District Court 2000Kahap83560, and was sentenced to a judgment in favor of all on March 30, 2002. Of the above judgments, the part as to K was finalized, but the part as to M and L was finalized, but the part as to M were against the Plaintiff from the appellate court (Seoul High Court 2002Na27899) to October 9, 2003 from the appellate court (Seoul High Court 2002Na27899) against the Plaintiff on October 19, 2003 (Seoul High Court 203Da58348, while F appealed appealed appealed appealed with the Supreme Court 2003Da58348, Nov. 10, 206
As a result of the above judgment, F is about the forest land of this case to E.