All prosecutions against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On May 2013, Defendant A, at his own residence in Sacheon-si, and around December 12, 2012, even if the larceny of the theft case occurred at his own house, was not the victim D, Defendant A damaged the reputation of the victim by publicly pointing out that “D is taking a face of the quality of DNA. D is going beyond its windows, and D goes beyond its windows and is going under the bottom of D’s wife, thereby going against two or more apartments by openly pointing out false facts.”

B. Defendant B, around May 2013, told residents G, etc. to the same purport as the above paragraph (1) and damaged the honor of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

2. Each of the facts charged against the Defendants is a crime falling under Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent pursuant to Article 312(2) of the Criminal Act. According to the records of the instant case, it can be acknowledged that the victim has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the Defendants on June 1, 2015, which is after the prosecution of the instant case. Accordingly, each of the charges against the Defendants is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.