logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.10.02 2019고정119
의료기사등에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In Daegu Jung-gu, the Defendant operated the “Crd Foreign Legal Consultant”.

No person other than medical technicians, etc. shall perform duties, such as medical technicians, etc.

Nevertheless, from August 10, 2015 to October 3, 2016, the Defendant employed non-licensed radiation workers D as radiation workers from a clinic outside the prison, and allowed the patients to take chest X-ray photographs, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant violated the above laws and regulations in relation to the defendant's business at the above time and place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's response to the personal information of the representative of the closed medical institution [the defendant and his defense counsel stated that "it was not negligent in giving due attention and supervision to prevent such employment," so the employment of D is in full charge of F, the office manager, and the defendant paid a larger amount of benefits to D, the defendant obtained a radiation engineer's license, and on October 4, 2016, when it was found late after the fact that D was without a license was employed in the process of collecting the early TRD's place, it is difficult to view the circumstances and legal supervision of the defendant as not negligent in giving due attention and supervision." In light of the fact that D was employed on October 4, 2016, when it was found that the defendant believed that the office manager's report was the radiation engineer's credit, and that he was naturally entrusted with the radiation engineer's license, and that the defendant knew that it was in violation of the law and immediately corrected, but it is difficult to see that the defendant's statement and legal supervision was not neglected].

1. Relevant provisions of the relevant criminal facts and the provisions of Article 32, Article 30 (1) 1, and the main sentence of Article 9 (1) of the Act on the Violation of the Medical Technicians, etc. Selection of Penalties;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 of the Criminal Procedure Act provides for an order of provisional payment.

arrow