The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) is as follows: (a) the Defendant was close at the time of the instant accident; (b) so, the Defendant’s vehicle did not recognize the fact that the Defendant caused the instant accident that strings the victim’s vehicle or the fact that the victim was injured; and (c) the victim did not have been aware of the occurrence of the accident, leaving the site of this case, and there was no criminal intent to escape; and (d) there was no intention to commit the crime of escape; and (e) the injury, such as the Defendant’s knife, knife, knife, etc., suffered by the victim, cannot be determined as the injury caused by

Judgment

In full view of the facts and circumstances found by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the defendant can be found to have escaped without taking measures, such as aiding and abetting the victim, even though he was injured by a vehicle driven by the victim with a vehicle driven by the defendant as stated in the facts charged of this case. Thus, the judgment of the court below in the same conclusion is just and acceptable, and the defendant's assertion that the occurrence of the accident in this case was not recognized, or that the victim's injury was not caused by the accident in this case is not a result of

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.