beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of the lawsuit, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the decision on retrial;
A. The Plaintiff’s position 1) The Plaintiff ordinarily employs approximately 130 full-time workers to “D University”, which is a distance college-type lifelong educational establishment under Article 33 of the Lifelong Education Act (hereinafter “instant University”).
2) The Intervenor B is a juristic person operating the business. The Intervenor B was awarded the degree of child welfare department and literature doctor at E University on August 25, 2008 and was appointed as a full-time lecturer at the Child Care Department of this case on August 24, 2009, and was reappointed as a full-time lecturer on August 8, 201, and was reappointed as an assistant professor on August 12, 2013 (the appointment period: from September 1, 2013 to August 31, 2015).
3) On February 17, 2006, the Intervenor C was awarded a degree of social business and social welfare doctorate at F University on August 7, 2007, and was appointed as a full-time lecturer at the University’s social welfare department of this case on July 13, 2009, and was reappointed as a full-time lecturer on August 8, 201, and was reappointed as an assistant professor on August 12, 2013 (the appointment period: from September 1, 2013 to August 31, 2015). (b) On March 3, 2015, the Plaintiff instructed each of the directors of the University of this case on March 3, 2015, each of the above provisions attached to the official text stating that “The time of compliance with the provisions regarding faculty, personnel affairs, and evaluation of achievements”.
2) On April 13, 2015, the Plaintiff notified four teachers, including the intervenors, to apply for deliberation on re-election within 15 days from the date of receipt of the notice, where the Intervenor B knew that the period of appointment expires as a person subject to re-election during the last half-year period of 2015, and he/she wishes to apply for deliberation on re-election. 3) On April 23, 2015, the Intervenor C submitted research achievements as follows when he/she applied for deliberation on re-election to the Plaintiff on April 28, 2015.
1 G 1 G 22 H on June 2014, 2014, 23 I on July 7, 2014, 2014, 1 G 1 G 1, 2013, the author of the research date of the title of research products. J 4 J 4, 2014.