1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff, who was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for two years due to a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (flavoring) and was finally sentenced and declared to imprisonment with prison labor for the violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc., was returned to a swimming house from November 11, 2013, and was transferred to a leisure house on September 29, 20

B. On February 11, 2014, the Defendant found that, as a result of the living room inspection, the Defendant possessed, without permission, one string, six strings (10cm), one strings (10cm), one strings for table use, two strings, one strings made up of a panty trings, three strings, and three strings made up of magazines.

C. On February 20, 2014, the Defendant, without obtaining permission from the Plaintiff in accordance with the resolution of the Suwon Detention House Disciplinary Committee.

The punitive action was taken for 13 days in place on the ground that he had the goods described in the subsection.

(B) No. 4, hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition”). / [Grounds for recognition] without dispute, entry of No. 4, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

가. 원고의 주장 1) ① 팬티로 담요를 씌워 만든 베개는 원고의 척추 통증 완화를 위해 만든 것인 점, ② 수건 3개를 꿰매 만든 담요커버 등은 피고가 이를 지적한 사실이 없는 점, ③ 탁상용 달력에 관하여는 허가를 받은 점, ④ 통에 담은 인주, 여성의 사진이 있는 책받침은 다른 재소자들도 소지하고 있는 점, ⑤ 실뭉치 및 고무줄은 원고가 소지하고 있던 것이 아닌 점 등에 비추어 보면, 원고는 허가 없이 물품을 소지하였다고 볼 수 없으므로, 이 사건 처분은 처분사유가 부존재하여 위법하다. 2) 원고는 처분의 근거가 된 규정을 알지 못하였고, 만약 피고 또한 원고에게 위와 같은 규정을 미리 알려주지 않은 점에 비추어 볼 때, 이 사건 처분은 과잉금지원칙에 반하여 위법하다.

B. It is as stated in the attached Form of the relevant statutes.

C. The first argument.