logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.05.26 2016고정4137
자동차관리법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 13, 2016, at around 16:10 on August 13, 2016, the Defendant, from the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, a residential area, to the end of the 249 new hotel in Jung-gu, Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, and operated the D Mapo car, the Defendant was ordered to stop the operation by the head of Jung-gu, Seoul.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. An explanatory note and a control photograph;

1. Details of the report on internal accidents, the comprehensive list of vehicles and the comprehensive list of vehicles;

1. Report of previous convictions and results of the investigation (verification of the facts of the same kind of crime as the suspect) (the defendant and his defense counsel did not know that the defendant was the vehicle subject to the order to suspend the operation of the said vehicle;

However, on July 11, 2016, the Defendant was unaware of the fact that the said car was a vehicle for suspending the operation at the time when the first vehicle was discovered while operating the said car and being investigated.

On August 13, 2016, the police investigation was conducted prior to the first week due to the second detection of the said vehicle, and the said vehicle was aware that it was an order to suspend its operation on the 30th of the same month. In addition, the second detection of the said vehicle while operating the said vehicle again on the 30th of the same month and issued a summary order of KRW 300,000,000.

It clearly stated that the above assertion is clearly contrary to the defendant's records and statements in violation of the above provision.

Application of Statutes

1. Article 82 subparagraph 2-2 of the relevant Act and Articles 24-2 and 24-2 (2) of the Automobile Management Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

1. Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act bearing Costs of Trial;

arrow