1. Within the scope of each inherited property from the network E, to the Plaintiff

A. Defendant B is 22,070,978 won and 11.0

Attached Form

The facts indicated in the cause of the claim do not conflict between the parties, and on the other hand, according to the overall purport of the statement in the evidence No. 1 and the argument, the Defendants’ application for a qualified acceptance (Seoul Family Court 2016Ra2932, Apr. 5, 2016) was accepted on July 22, 2016. As such, the Defendants are obligated to pay the Plaintiff the money and delay damages as stated in the purport of the claim, which is calculated as the shares of inheritance, to the Plaintiff within the scope of each inherited property from the network E., to the extent of each inherited property.

As to this, the plaintiff intentionally omitted shares of the new financial branch, which were held by the deceased E in the process of applying for a qualified acceptance, and this constitutes a legal ground for the statutory simple acceptance under Article 1026 of the Civil Code. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge this, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.