logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2019.11.28 2019고단1939
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 10, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 500,000 as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act, etc. at the pure support of the Gwangju District Court on May 10, 2007, and a fine of KRW 3 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the same court on February 6, 2014.

On August 4, 2019, at around 19:29, the Defendant driven the B-wing truck under the influence of alcohol leveling 0.053% from the section of about 500 meters of blood alcohol level to the intersection of the 88-1st parallel in the same side of the road located in the new site of the Yacheon-si, Yacheon-si, Yacheon-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of inquiries, a copy of each summary order, and the Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (2) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation and community service order Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act: The defendant's criminal records (the existence and frequency of the same kind of power, interval with the existing same kind of power, etc.); the nature of the crime of this case; the degree of blood alcohol concentration of the defendant at the time of driving of this case; the details of the control; the defendant's reflectivity at the time of driving of this case; and the family relationship and other various conditions of sentencing specified in the records and arguments of this case shall be

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.

arrow