Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, for each of 8 months, for Defendant B, E, F, G, H and J, and for 10 months, for each of 10 months.

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Records】

1. On September 22, 2016, Defendant B was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a violation of the Fisheries Act in the Daegu District Court’s Branch Branch of Port, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on the 30th of the same month.

2. On October 6, 2016, Defendant E was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a violation of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions in the Daegu District Court Branch of the Daegu District Court for the violation of the said Act, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on April 27, 2017.

3. On January 27, 2016, Defendant H was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Fishery Resources Management Act in the Daegu District Court Port Support Act, etc. and such judgment was rendered for eight months.

2. 4. Finality has been made.

[2] Criminal facts M are those who operate an administrative private office in the name of "M fishery administrative agent" in the NAN at the port of distribution as a technical administrative agent, and those who work as the head of the above administrative private office.

The above M/O, while serving in the above administrative office, knew that he/she provided credit guarantee to fishermen in the Agricultural and Fishery Personnel Credit Guarantee Fund of Korea to provide credit guarantee to fishermen in the Agricultural and Fishery Personnel Management Fund of Korea when he/she sold a vessel or arranged the sale and purchase of a vessel to sell or sell a vessel, and provided a prompt loan to fishermen at 70 to 80% of the purchase price stated in the ship transaction contract with Defendant A, P, etc. and the parties to the ship transaction introduced from Defendant A, P, etc., to prepare a shipbuilding contract with the parties to the ship transaction, wherein the purchase price under the ship transaction contract is less than the actual purchase price, and then the parties to the ship transaction agreed to receive the down payment under the above contract after a subsequent return of the amount equivalent to the down payment under the contract, and made the details of the deposit as if the above purchaser deposited the ship's seller, and Defendant A and P introduced the parties to the ship transaction to the above M, as above, and the aforementioned acts were false.