logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2014.11.20 2014고단208
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is the owner of A truck, and around 01:00 on November 23, 1994, the Defendant, who is his employee, refused to comply with the demand for an excessive survey at the tamper's office located in the tamper's office located in the tamper's office located in the 23 line of the National Road, and (2) around 02:00 on the same day, the Defendant refused to comply with the demand for an excessive survey at the tamper's office located in the tamper's office located in the Yongsan-gun National Road located in the Yongsan-gun National Road located in the Yansan-gun National Road

2. The Constitutional Court Decision 2012Hun-Ga18 dated October 25, 2012 (former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act) which held that the applicable provisions of this case shall retroactively lose effect (the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act);

arrow