1. The defendant is not guilty. 2. The defendant will notify the defendant of the summary of the judgment.

1. The Defendant entered into an agreement on August 24, 2012 with the content that “A victim shall pay KRW 6 million to the Defendant on the condition that the Defendant withdraws his/her business license to the above her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her she

Nevertheless, on April 30, 2013, the Defendant filed a lawsuit claiming an agreed amount of KRW 6 million with the content that “The Defendant paid KRW 6 million to the Defendant,” which is located in the Suwon District Court in Pyeongtaek-si, Pyeongtaek-do, 1036 (Dong Dong Dong-dong). The Defendant filed a lawsuit claiming a agreed amount of KRW 6 million on June 30, 2012, even though the Defendant reported the closure of the above her business, and on September 20, 2012, the victim did not pay KRW 6 million according to the agreement.”

However, on December 20, 2012, the victim's succession to the status of the business operator with respect to the above telecom and Lestons was done in favor of the victim's lawsuit for confirmation of the existence of the right of lease filed against the defendant, and the defendant was requested to correct the cessation of the above telecom closed ex officio as of June 30, 2012 by requesting the correction of the cessation of the above telecom on September 20, 2012, in order to pretend that the conditions of the above agreement were fulfilled. The defendant could not receive the above agreement from the victim because it was not fulfilled.

The defendant, as above, attempts to acquire pecuniary benefits by deceiving the competent court and having the competent court render a judgment that the defendant would pay 6 million won to the victim.