1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The plaintiff's claim extended by this court is dismissed.

3. Appeal.

1. In the first instance trial, the Plaintiff filed a claim for suspension of performance of duties with respect to the Defendant until the judgment becomes final and conclusive, and ② payment of KRW 100,000,000 with respect to compensation for damages arising from illegal acts and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 5% per annum from August 18, 2015 to the date the judgment of the first instance is rendered, and 15% per annum from the next day to the date of full payment.

The first instance court rendered a judgment dismissing the plaintiff's request for suspension of performance of duties and dismissing the request for monetary payment.

The Plaintiff appealed on the part of the first instance judgment regarding the claim for monetary payment, and claimed 100,000,000 won against the Defendant and damages for delay at the rate of 15% per annum from August 18, 2015 to the date of full payment.

Accordingly, the plaintiff's claim for the suspension of performance of duties against the defendant was excluded from this Court's judgment, and the claim for the damages for delay was expanded.

2. Determination on the claim for monetary payment

A. The reasoning for this part of the basic facts is the same as the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance (from 7th to 20th of the same page). Thus, this part is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

B. The grounds for this part of the argument and judgment are as follows, and the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance (from 3th to 6th 9th eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth e

Part 5 of the 4th page "damages on Interest" shall be "damages on Interest at the rate of 15% per annum from August 18, 2015 to the date of full payment."

The 5th page "to the plaintiff" shall be "to the defendant".

3. The plaintiff's claim for payment of money must be dismissed as it is reasonable.

The judgment of the first instance is just based on the conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal and the plaintiff's claim expanded by this court are all filed.