1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, each of the plaintiffs' 16,548,870 won against the defendant, and 216,80,006 won against the plaintiff A, and the plaintiff.

1. The reasons for the court’s explanation concerning this case are as follows: “The maximum working age of Plaintiff A cannot be calculated by considering Plaintiff A’s assertion as age between 63 and 65)” after the first instance court’s first instance judgment No. 8; “The attached amount of damages calculated by changing Plaintiff A’s maximum working age to the attached form of the first instance court’s judgment; and the attached amount of damages shall be changed to the attached form of the first instance court’s judgment; “the expenses for post-treatment treatment and auxiliary aids” of Article 2(b) of the first instance judgment (the title of the lawsuit shall be changed to “the expenses for post-treatment treatment, future treatment, and auxiliary aids”; the limitation of liability; (f) deduction; and (h) “the expenses for post-treatment treatment” of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act shall be admitted as it is by the main sentence of Article 420 of the same Act, except for the following changes.

【Revised Part】

B. Wang medical expenses, etc.: (a) When the victim, who received insurance benefits under the National Health Insurance Act of KRW 284,66,66, claims for damages against a third party, the victim’s negligence lies in the occurrence of such damage, the victim’s negligence shall be offset from the amount of damages calculated first, and the insurance benefits shall not be offset again for the insurance benefits to be deducted (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 2010Da13732, Jul. 8, 2010; 2009Da44563, Sept. 10, 209; 2009Da44563, Jul. 10, 2009; (b) the total amount of the insurance benefits paid by the Plaintiff from the date of the closure of the first instance trial to the date of the closing of argument; (c) the amount of the insurance benefits paid by the National Health Insurance Corporation shall be reduced to KRW 1,596,165; and (d) the amount of the insurance benefits paid by the Plaintiff’s 1627.7