logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2019.01.17 2018재나242
대여금
Text

1. The lawsuit of this case shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of retrial shall be borne by the plaintiff.

purport, purport, ..

Reasons

1. Inasmuch as a lawsuit on a retrial on the final and conclusive judgment that became final and conclusive as to the lawfulness of the lawsuit in this case is permitted only where there exist grounds stipulated under each subparagraph of Article 451(1) of the Civil Procedure Act, the lawsuit on retrial is unlawful where the

(See Supreme Court Decision 82Hun-Ga14 delivered on September 14, 1982, etc.). However, the main purport of the Plaintiff’s assertion was that the determination of the original decision that was not accepted by the Plaintiff’s assertion on the grounds that the network B, the mother of the Defendants, was erroneous, and this does not constitute grounds for retrial under each subparagraph of Article 451(1) of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In conclusion, the lawsuit of this case is unlawful and thus, it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow