logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.10.10 2018고단2869
전자금융거래법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

Where a defendant fails to pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be the day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Except as otherwise expressly provided for in any other Act, no person shall borrow or lend any access medium, or store, deliver or distribute such medium, while receiving, demanding or promising to receive, demand or promise any compensation.

Around January 23, 2018, the Defendant: (a) received a proposal from a person in a name-free mind to offer KRW 3,000,000 from a month when he/she borrowed the check; (b) received such proposal; and (c) delivered the check to a person in a name-free position via Kwikset service article, which sent the name-free cards connected to the Defendant’s bank account (Account Number: C) on the front side of the construction site of B building in Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-do.

Accordingly, the Defendant promised to pay the price, and lent the approaching media.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on deposit transactions;

1. Article 49 of the Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense, Article 49 of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions through which punishment is selected, and Article 6 (3) 2 of the same Act, and Article 6 (3) 2 of the same Act, and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order: The act of lending an access medium is a crime that is highly likely to be used for a crime such as tax evasion, gambling, and springing.

In fact, the personal card lent by the defendant was used to commit fraud and the damage was caused.

The favorable circumstances: the defendant reflects the crime, and there is no record of criminal punishment after 1993.

There seems to be no benefit acquired from the crime of this case.

As above, the Defendant’s punishment as ordered shall be determined by comprehensively taking account of the circumstances unfavorable to the Defendant, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, motive, background, means and consequence of the commission of the crime, and the circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., and the sentencing conditions

arrow