All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal that the court below sentenced the defendants to each punishment (five years of imprisonment with prison labor for the defendants A and four years of imprisonment with prison labor for the defendants B) is too unreasonable.

[Defendant B asserted that only the initial unfair sentencing was the ground for appeal, but only after the lapse of the deadline for submission of the statement of grounds for appeal ( May 28, 2015), Defendant B did not participate in the crime of robbery in the instant case. That is, Defendant B’s act of assaulting the first victim in the course of forcing the victim to board the vehicle in compliance with Defendant A’s instructions, and Defendant B was unable to force the victim to assault the victim while driving the vehicle. Since Defendant B became aware of the fact that the victim was injured during that process, Defendant B did not bear any responsibility for the injury inflicted before participating in the crime, Defendant B cannot be held liable for the crime of robbery injury against the victim. However, examining the evidence duly examined by the court below including the confessions and statements made by the victim in the lower court, and thus, Defendant B could not reverse the judgment of the court below within the limit of 20 days after the victim’s statement of grounds for appeal and remaining before Defendant B’s new evidence was found within the limit of 20 days after the submission deadline of the statement of grounds for appeal.

In addition, the Defendants withdraw money from the cash automatic machines using the check card taken by the victim and using the victim's resident registration certificate.